Nov 4 2005

The Reporter vs. the Novelist (Part I)

E-Mail E-Mail     Print Print

EVERY NEWSPAPER REPORTER at some point in her hectic career flirts with the idea of cutting loose to write a novel, just as every novelist dreams in his wretched solitude of a more gregarious life at a daily newspaper. This is to a great extent due to the misperception that the pasture is greener on the other side of the literary fence, but there is also a deeper sense that there exists the same blood-bond between the reporter and the novelist as there exists between twins who have been separated at birth and raised at opposite ends of the globe; naturally one dreams, even if mundane realities prevent it, of dropping one’s job and setting off for the willies in an oh-brother-where-art-thou trek for the long lost twin.

There is also the fact that every writer—or at least the anxious, competitive, insecure sort of writer, which accounts for a hefty chunk of the good ones—is continuously measuring his or her life by the lives of past writers, and any glance at the biographies of canonized writers will suggest that a ‘real’ writer should not be a virgin in either reporting or fiction. Of course this is baloney and many of the best fiction writers have never been reporters, and the same holds vice versa. But the myth nonetheless remains, and so the leapfrogging of writers between fiction and reporting goes on, only further perpetuating the illusion that there is some essential bond between the two.

Continue reading

  • Share/Bookmark